TRANSPARENCY
How we protect the independence of our work, what we make visible and how it can be questioned or reported.
Legal content marked for lawyer review. It does not replace legal advice.
Last updated: April 21, 2026
GUIDING PRINCIPLE
Verifiable independence
Independence is not only declared. It is designed, documented and made reviewable. Evaluating independently means that no commercial, institutional or reputational interest predetermines our conclusions.
PUBLIC COMMITMENTS
What anyone should be able to require from us
We do not sell conclusions, we declare and manage conflicts, we explain methods, assumptions and limits, we protect people and their data, we create space for challenge and review, and we correct while leaving a trace.
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
How we protect independence in every engagement
We review independence before accepting work, define the evaluation design, document fieldwork, carry out critical review, report complete findings and archive decisions for later learning.
TRACEABILITY
What we publish and what we keep supported
Transparency does not mean exposing everything. We publish the necessary minimum, keep internally auditable evidence, protect personal data and correct with date, reason and a learning record.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
How we understand and handle conflicts
We care about independence in fact and in appearance. Real, potential or apparent conflicts must be declared, documented, isolated, reassigned, reviewed or lead us to reject the engagement when they cannot be mitigated.
REPORTS AND ALERTS
Entry point for reports
We receive alerts about independence, conflicts, manipulation of findings, methodological opacity, misuse of data or practices contrary to this standard. You may write to proyectos@resuelve.com.co or use the anonymous channel when there is risk of retaliation or a need for greater confidentiality.
PUBLIC REPORTING
Public evidence of compliance
This standard contemplates periodic reports on covered processes, mitigated conflicts, alerts received, cases with corrective action, public corrections, external reviews and policy changes.
REFERENCES
International references
This content draws on international frameworks for evaluation, quality, independence, verification, reporting channels and human rights, including UNEG, OECD, Impact Principles, IAASB, ISO 37002 and the UN Guiding Principles.
Write to us.
Tell us which programme you want to understand better. Here's what happens next:
- 01We read your messageWe reply within 48 hours.
- 02We schedule a callTo understand your programme and what you need to know about it.
- 03We propose a pathHow we'd evaluate it, with what scope and deliverables.